Sep 28, 2010 12:37 pm I'd look at the Krystal Audio Engine for tracking.
I like Audacity, it's cool and works well for what it is, but I wouldn't multitrack in it when things like Krystal, or even Reaper, are available for free.
audacity?
Posted on Sep 27, 2010 11:29 pm
ell man
Member Since: Sep 27, 2010
hi,
my question to you guys is:
if im looking for a software to record and mix and edit etc on a high professional level, but without any midi or synth or anything (all audio), do i really have to get a software like sonar or cubase or something, or could i get the same results with audacity?
ive heard horrible things about audacity, and also some very good things. im wondering if id be making a mistake putting my projects in the hands of this free and simple software..
what do you say?
(-; ell
[ Back to Top ]
Sep 28, 2010 12:37 pm I'd look at the Krystal Audio Engine for tracking.
I like Audacity, it's cool and works well for what it is, but I wouldn't multitrack in it when things like Krystal, or even Reaper, are available for free.
Oct 01, 2010 05:06 pm ProTools isn't very midi focused, and it is the most efficient editing DAW I've tried. Expensive, yes. Annoying hidden costs, yes. Worth it? I guess so. I haven't switched yet. I tried reaper and cubase and disliked them. Ableton is more of a midi thing but I like that too for an alternative workflow.
Samplitude looks awesome for tracking/editing (not Samplitube).
If you're on a budget, Sony ACID is where I got started. Even though it's marketed as an electronic music tool...I never used it that way. One of the most intuitive DAW's I've used.
|
Related Forum Topics: |
If you would like to participate in the forum discussions, feel free to register for your free membership.