"Losing sight" - comments appreciated
Home > Home Recording Forum > Music & Composition > "Losing sight" - comments appreciated
J-botByte-MixerMember
Since: Dec 04, 2007
Jan 19, 2009 10:15 am Well, the first half, or thereabouts sounds muffled to me, sounds like a different sample actually compared to the "brighter" half. Not sure if that's intentional, such as playing on a closed grand, and then having the lid opened for the second half, but that's the only thing I can really think of.
If you're looking for compositional input, then I'd say, while short and fairly simple, the structure and arrangement is well done, and stays interesting, but being so short, there's not a lot of room for development. There is some, but a longer piece would give you more to work with. Course that might just be a clip, and my input here could be irrelevant heh.
That said, it does not stagnate like some things I've heard out there, and it keeps the ear listening. I think it would make pretty nice movie-like music.
-J
Noize2uCzar of MidiAdministrator
Since: Apr 04, 2002
Jan 20, 2009 05:40 pm Fixed your link. It directed users to their own music page.
But I have to agree with J-bot as well. It seems to fade to a brighter tone starting at 48 seconds and the by 50 seconds it is very bright.
It almost sounds like a combination of the lid being opened and a slight damping being released.
but other then that, I agree as well. Simple yet with enough movement to keep interest.
Dematrixhttp://www.reverbnation.com/2ndgMember
Since: Nov 27, 2007
Jan 20, 2009 06:57 pm i'll second what Noize said, but thinking about it, movies are very dynamic as is music, so, that effect could be perfect for the right scene.
i really liked it.
in a way it started of kinda dark and dull eq wise, and ended up brighter dynamicly.
i guess thats where they get the term shade/light.
ToptiI've got a vision.Member
Since: Dec 05, 2008
Jan 21, 2009 05:50 pm Thanks, the "intimate->open" transition was exactly my idea however it occured during the mixing process, so I guess everyone's partly right.