Posted on Jul 10, 2007 08:03 am
dbmasters
Administrator Since: Apr 03, 2002
www.computerworld.com.au/...42;fp;16;fpid;0
So the ratings authority, Nielsen/NetRatings, is rethinking how they rate which web pages are most popular...dropping page views and instead favoring time spent...
This, to me, seems so incredibly stupid...they both are worthy metrics, I watch them both for HRC personally, but page views is solid, a good way to rate sites, but has it's downsides too, if somebody spends 6 pages on HRC, 5 of them for a second, just to click thru to the 6th, perhaps navigation is poor...but, time spent...sites like YouTube and GoogleVideo will rule cuz once you get to a page you are stuck for the length of the video...kinda seems to favor sites that have content like multimedia...or, sites that are horribly difficult to find stuff on...
Thoughts? Seems weird, perhaps nobody but me cares...
[ Back to Top ]
Related Forum Topics: |
If you would like to participate in the forum discussions, feel free to register for your free membership.