You don't have to spend hundred or thousands of dollars...

Contributed By


You can get started recording without taking out a second mortage on your house...

Every so often as a look through the forums, articles and other content at HRC and other home recording web sites (yes, there ARE others :-) I notice one simple fact seems to be forgotten. That simple fact is that you CAN record music and have fun producing music without breaking the bank.

Many times someone will ask a question that will always result in answers like "go buy this $500 plugin", or, "in this $800 program that doesn't happen" rather than trying to remedy the situation with what the person has.

While it is true many of us here fancy using Steinberg WaveLab or full blown Sound Forge (formerly from Sonic Foundry, now owned by Sony) for our final editing and mastering tasks, many forget that there are other tools available that will do much of the same things for much cheaper. Programs like GoldWave, SoundEdit Pro, Older versions of Sound Forge called the "Studio" editions and many others sell for MUCH less money and do all the basics of audio editing and mastering. Obviously lacking some of the power-user features of the big names, but still very capable programs for someone that doesn't have, or doesn't want to spend a boat-load of money.

When it comes to multitracking we often talk of Sonar, Cubase, ProTools, Vegas and others that sell for several hundred dollars when there are things like MultiTrack Studio, Intuitive MX, N Track and many others. The cheaper ones may not have some of the high-end MIDI sequencing abilities, gobs of routing options or dozens of built in effects, but they do what they are supposed to, which is multitrack.

In regards to the previously mentioned effects, there is a massive amount of free DirectX and VST plugins available all over the internet from generous programmers andmore coming every day. A place like The DirectX Files has links to many. Many of these are very good, and well, some suck, but ya do what ya can. HRC staff member "flametheband" wrote a great article about freeware plugins and apps which you can read here.

There are also less expensive options for sound cards, hardware effects units, mixers and much, much more. Money can also be saved in the do-it-yourself arena as well. Our recording tips section has a few projects you can do to save money in your venture.

Obviously, all of these money savings moves do come with sacrifice in features and/or quality, but, it's just a question of whether you are willing to sacrifice to at least be making music, rather than making none at all.

My main motivation for writing this is the fear that after reading the forums at this site or any other will result in scaring off someone that wants to get into the hobby, which I think we will all agree is a rewarding one, because of the numbers they see racking up in their heads over what they HAVE to get to start recording.

At the end of the day, it's not always the gear that you have, but the person behind that gear that makes the difference. I would rather work with a great musician with mediocre gear, than a mediocre musician with great gear.

Related Forum Topics:



User-submitted comments


TheTincanbug
Dec 18, 2003 10:08 am
great article
You make a very good point with this article. A newbie to the craft can be overwhelmed by all the options out there. A sound setup that may be unacceptable to someone who works in a modern studio facility may make a great hobby studio for a musician who just wants to be able to multitrack their own compositions.
Take me, for example. I threw my studio together basicly on a shoestring budget, and I'm very happy with my sound quality as of right now (in Members's Music, the song named Wiggle & Twitch, on the instrumental pro side, is a good example of the sound quality I'm hitting right now).

Here's what I have and what I paid for it. Starting with the absolute bare essentials for recording first.

The Bare Essentials:
800 mhz generic computer from cheap parts - (free for xmas, thank you family)
Cheap computer speakers - (hand me downs from my buddy who's an IT manager)
SoundBlaster "standard" sound card, I forget what the name is - (about $30 on eBay)
Behringer Eurorack MX602A mixer, indispensable, couldn't do a thing without it - ($75)

Upgrades:
An empty walk-in closet for my studio remote station - (came with the house, duh)
Remote computer monitor/mouse/keyboard station in my studio - includes a/b switch box - ($10 for monitor at the Salvation Army store, free hand-me-down mouse and keyboard, a/b switch was $26 on eBay)
M-Audio 2496 sound card - ($115 on eBay)
Alesis Nanocompressor - ($50 on clearance from Guitar Center)
over-the-ear headphones, admittedly not high quality but does the job - ($20, I think, from Radio Hack)
SansAmp G2 amp simulator, it emulates the sound of different types of amps so you can record line-in instead of miking your guitar - crucial when there's a sleeping baby next door to your studio - (I don't remember how much it was, it's old... maybe $70?)
Morley Wah pedal for guitar - ($100, I think?)

Instruments:
Ovation Celebrity guitar - (xmas present in high school)
Old Fender bass - ($100, used)
Assorted hand drums and percussion instruments - (many of them, varying from $10 for cheap shakers to $300 for the djembe)
Microphones - Shure SM57, a great all-purpose mic ($75) - V-Tech cheap little mic ($15) - Oktava MK019 condensor mic, a great value for a cheapo condensor mic - ($99 from Guitar Center with cardioid attachment only - but got it for an xmas present so it's free for me)


With this basic setup I am more than capable of recording single tracks of music and multitracking them to produce a decent-sounding final product. "Decent" to my ears, being an amateur hobbyist composer - not world-class quality but low noise with a lot of clarity and reasonably live-sounding instruments.


mccarty
Dec 22, 2003 01:35 pm
agreed.
i couldn't agree more with this article. i myself am 16 years old, in a band and wanting to get into home recording to produce demo tapes and whatnot. i feel what a lot of magazines and websites don't account for is that not everybody is some sound purist grand-per-microphone sound engineer.

for example, my set up is pretty basic, all i want to do is record some vocals, guitar, bass, drums yada yada. when i first started out i was asking for advice on what equipment i would need and was bombarded with tales that drums would need 6+ microphones, and they had to be good, cubasis vst wouldnt do etc.

however, i'm using two PG58 microphones to do everything. i've heard bad things about them, but as a demo-tape-maker-16-year-old-band-member, slight differences in sound don't make too much of a difference to me.

i appreciate there are those who will have vast home studios built, and are looking for the perfect sound in everything they buy. but next time somebody writes an article, or a piece of advice, think about us too!!


flame
Mar 15, 2004 06:27 am
very true
just check my site for examples of what you can do with a cheapo mic, a 30mhz pc and beginners multitrack software...

http://www.flamemusic.com

lykwydchykyn
Dec 24, 2004 12:38 am
I'm amazed
I'm amazed when I think about how cheap it is to get into multitrack recording now. If we'd had this kind of stuff 10 years ago my life would be a lot different now. Back then even a modest 16 track studio was a $5k-$8k proposal. 15 years ago it was quite a bit more than that!

Now for well under a thousand bucks you can get a second hand computer, freeware, a cheap set of powered monitors, and a small board. And LDC mics for under $100?? Unheard of when I was getting into this. Your options back then were sm57 or sm58.

I think this is good to think about, especially when kids start pirating Cubase or Nuendo because it's "just so expensive".


If you would like to leave comments to the articles you read, feel free to register for your free membership.